| Typical system voltage range | 3–6 kV class | 6–12 kV class | 10–24 kV class | 35 kV and above |
| Common continuous operating voltage, Uc | Approximately 2.55–5.1 kV | Approximately 5.1–10.2 kV | Approximately 8.4–19.2 kV | Selected according to the system grounding and temporary overvoltage study |
| 8/20 μs nominal discharge current, In | Typically 2.5–5 kA | Typically 5–10 kA | Typically 10 kA | Typically 10–20 kA, depending on the station design |
| 8/20 μs meaning | A standardized current impulse with an approximately 8 μs front time and 20 μs time to half-value. It is used to evaluate discharge capability and protective performance. |
| 1.2/50 μs lightning impulse | A standardized voltage impulse with an approximately 1.2 μs front time and 50 μs time to half-value. It is used for insulation coordination and impulse withstand testing; it is not an 8/20 μs current rating. |
| Typical protective level, Up | Lower voltage level suitable for compact distribution equipment | Balanced protection for transformers, cables, and switchgear | Low residual voltage with increased energy withstand | Specified by the arrester manufacturer and coordinated with equipment insulation |
| Polymer housing benefit | Lightweight and resistant to mechanical damage | Hydrophobic silicone surface helps reduce pollution flashover risk | Suitable for outdoor exposure when sealing and aging performance are verified | Reduced shattering hazard compared with porcelain during severe failure |
| Recommended application | Small distribution transformers and lightly exposed overhead lines | General medium-voltage distribution networks | High-lightning-density areas, long overhead feeders, and industrial substations | Substations, busbars, transformer terminals, and high-energy switching locations |
| Key selection priority | Correct Uc and adequate insulation coordination | 10 kA class capability, suitable residual voltage, and reliable sealing | Energy withstand, thermal stability, pollution performance, and line discharge capability | Line discharge class, energy rating, thermal stability, and verified type-test performance |
| Best-fit conclusion | Cost-efficient for moderate exposure | Best general-purpose choice for many medium-voltage networks | Preferred where lightning frequency and system energy are higher | Best for high-energy substation duty when the complete specification is verified |